Clear Directives
Providing specific, actionable commands that leave no ambiguity about what compliance looks like. One officer, one voice, one clear instruction at a time.
NYPD Patrol Guide Reference
Verbal Commands & Tactical Communication (PG 221-01)
"Members of the service should issue verbal commands in a clear, calm, and professional manner. Commands should be specific and direct, allowing the subject sufficient time to comply before escalating the level of force."
Source: NYPD Patrol Guide, Force Guidelines
Specificity: Commands should tell the subject exactly what to do, not just what not to do. "Put your hands on your head" is clearer than "Don't move."
One Voice: When multiple officers are present, one should take command voice to prevent conflicting instructions.
Processing Time: Allow reasonable time for the subject to hear, understand, and physically comply before repeating or escalating.
Best Practice Examples
These clips demonstrate officers giving clear, specific instructions that subjects can actually follow.
Specific Hand Placement Instructions
"Keep your hands in front of you. Ishmael, you gotta show me both. You gotta show me both of your hands, Ish."
Simple, Achievable First Step
"Gene. About the reports. What's up? Just open the door. We gotta talk. Just open the door and talk. We gotta tell you what to do."
Step-by-Step Compliance Path
"All you need to do is stand right there. I'll walk you... We're not gonna kill you. I promise. Ishmael, we're not gonna kill you."
Opportunities for Improvement
These clips show situations where clearer, more specific directives could have improved compliance. Note: These are high-stress armed encounters where urgency is justified, but communication techniques could still be optimized.
Repetitive Commands Without Variation
"Put the knife down! Put the knife down! Put the knife down! Put the knife down, sir! Sir, put the fucking knife down! Put the fucking knife down!"
Multiple Conflicting Commands
"Get on the fucking ground right now! Get on the fucking ground! Yo! Get on the fucking ground right now! Get on the ground! Put the fucking knife down!"
High Intensity Without Specificity
"Get on the fucking ground right now! Get on the fucking ground! Put the fucking knife down! Put the fucking knife down!"
How These Situations Could Be Improved
Transforming Vague Commands into Clear Directives
Instead of Saying...
Try Being More Specific...
Key Takeaways
🎯 Be Specific
"Put the knife on the ground in front of you" is clearer than "Put it down." The subject knows exactly what compliance looks like.
🔢 Sequence Your Commands
Give one instruction at a time. "First, set the knife down. Second, step back." Don't ask for multiple things simultaneously.
📣 One Voice
When multiple officers are present, designate one command voice. Multiple people yelling different things creates confusion and conflict.
⏱ Allow Processing Time
After giving a command, pause 3-5 seconds before repeating. Rapid-fire commands don't allow time for the brain to process and the body to comply.
🔄 Vary If Not Working
If the same command hasn't worked after 3 repetitions, try different wording. Repeating louder doesn't add new information.
👥 Use Names
When you know the subject's name, use it. "John, put your hands up" gets attention better than "Sir, hands up."
Discussion Questions for Training Sessions
In the "best practice" clips, how does specificity change the subject's ability to comply?
When two officers are giving different commands, how should they coordinate? Who takes lead?
What's the difference between "commanding presence" and "yelling louder"?
If "put the knife down" isn't working, what alternative phrasing might you try?
How much time should you give between commands before repeating? What factors affect this?
When is it appropriate to use profanity in commands? Does it help or hurt compliance?